Problem-1
Irregular Example Using the Recursion Tree Method
Solve the recurrence
using the Recursion Tree Method.
Step 1: Understand the Recurrence
The recurrence consists of
-
One subproblem of size
-
One subproblem of size
-
Linear work outside recursion
Thus,
but unlike Merge Sort,
the two recursive calls are not equal.
Why is this recurrence irregular?
Compare it with Merge Sort.
Merge Sort
Every recursive call produces
Both branches have the same height.
Present Recurrence
The left branch shrinks much faster than the right branch.
Hence,
the recursion tree is unbalanced.
This is exactly an irregular example.
Step 2: Draw the First Few Levels
Notice
Left child:
Right child:
Each level continues similarly.
Step 3: Cost of Each Level
The root performs
units of work.
Level 1
Nodes
Cost
Level 2
Nodes
Total cost
Again,
the level cost is
General Observation
At every level,
the subproblem sizes always add up to
Therefore,
every level contributes
Step 4: Height of the Tree
Unlike Merge Sort,
there is no single height.
Different branches stop at different times.
Leftmost Branch
Each level divides by
Problem size after
levels
Stop when
Thus,
Rightmost Branch
Each level divides only by
because
After
levels,
problem size
Stop when
Taking logarithms,
The rightmost branch determines the maximum height of the recursion tree.
Step 5: Total Cost of Internal Nodes
We found
Every level costs
Height
Therefore,
Step 6: What About the Leaves?
At first glance,
one might think
"The tree is binary. Therefore, the number of leaves must be about "
this reasoning is incorrect.
Incorrect Analysis
Height
Hence,
complete binary tree
contains
Since
this suggests
leaves.
This would imply
leaf cost,
which is larger than
But this conclusion is not correct because the recursion tree is not a complete binary tree. Most branches terminate earlier, especially those repeatedly taking the
Step 7: Counting Leaves Properly
Instead of guessing,
a new recurrence is introduced
Let
be the number of leaves.
Then
with
for small .
Notice that this recurrence is the same as the original one but without the term.
Step 8: Solve the Leaf Recurrence
Assume
Substitute
Thus,
We can prove the matching lower bound as an exercise, yielding
Step 9: Cost of Leaves
Each leaf contributes
Θ(1).
Number of leaves
Θ(n).
Therefore,
Leaf Cost=Θ(n).
Step 10: Final Cost
Internal nodes
Leaves
Therefore,
We can prove the matching lower bound by substitution, giving the tight result
Summary
| Step | Result |
|---|
| Recurrence |
|
| Tree type | Unbalanced (irregular) |
| Cost per level |
|
| Maximum height | (specifically, ) |
| Total internal-node cost |
|
| Number of leaves |
|
| Total leaf cost |
|
| Overall running time | |
Problem-2
Solve
using
-
Recursion Tree Method
-
Substitution Method ( verify )
Part I: Recursion Tree Method
Step 1: Draw the Recursion Tree
The recurrence is
Each recursive call produces one subproblem of size .
Unlike Merge Sort, this tree has only one node at each level.
Step 2: Cost at Each Level
Level 0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Pattern
At level ,
Problem size
Cost
Step 3: Height of the Tree
Recursion stops when
Therefore,
Hence,
Step 4: Total Cost
Add all levels.
This is a geometric series with ratio
Therefore,
Using
where
Hence,
Step 5: Guess
From the recursion tree,
Part II: Verify Using the Substitution Method
Step 1: Guess
Assume
for some constant
Step 2: Induction Hypothesis
Assume
Step 3: Substitute
The recurrence is
Substitute the induction hypothesis.
Step 4: Simplify
Hence,
Step 5: Choose the Constant
We want
Therefore,
Solve.
Hence,
Choose
Then
Thus, the induction step is proved.
Step 6: Base Case
Choose large enough so that
Hence,
the base case holds.
Conclusion
Therefore,
Showing the Tight Bound
To prove
prove the lower bound.
Assume
Then
We require
This gives
Choose
Hence,
Therefore,
Problem-3
Solve
using
-
Recursion Tree Method
-
Substitution Method
Part I: Recursion Tree Method
Step 1: Draw the Recursion Tree
Each recursive call generates 4 subproblems, each of size
Step 2: Cost at Each Level
Level 0
Number of nodes
Cost
Level 1
Number of nodes
Cost of each node
Total cost
Level 2
Number of nodes
Each node
Total cost
Level 3
Total cost
Pattern
At level
Number of nodes
Size of each subproblem
Cost of each node
Total cost
Step 3: Height of the Tree
Recursion stops when
Therefore,
Hence,
Step 4: Cost of the Leaves
Number of leaves
Using
we get
Each leaf costs
Hence,
Leaf cost
Step 5: Total Cost
The total cost is
Observe
Therefore,
the level costs increase geometrically.
Unlike the previous examples, the bottom levels dominate the total cost.
The last level contributes
Hence,
Guess
From the recursion tree,
where
Part II: Verify Using the Substitution Method
Step 1: Guess
Assume
for some constant .
Step 2: Induction Hypothesis
Assume
Step 3: Substitute
Given
substitute the induction hypothesis.
Step 4: Simplify
Using
and
we obtain
Step 5: Strengthen the Induction Hypothesis
The direct proof fails because of the extra
Strengthen the induction hypothesis.
Assume
where
Step 6: Substitute Again
Step 7: Simplify
Since
Also,
Hence,
Step 8: Choose the Constant
We require
Solving,
Choose
Hence,
Thus, the induction hypothesis is preserved.
Step 9: Base Case
Choose sufficiently large so that the inequality holds for the base case .
Conclusion
Therefore,
Tight Bound
The recurrence also satisfies
because the leaves dominate the recursion tree, and the Master Theorem (Case 1) gives the same result.
Final Answer
| Step | Result |
|---|
| Recurrence |
|
Cost at level
|
|
| Height |
|
| Leaf cost |
|
| Dominating level | Leaves |
| Guess | |
| Verified by substitution | |
| Tight bound | |
Problem-4
Solve the recurrence
using
-
Recursion Tree Method
-
Substitution Method
Part I: Recursion Tree Method
Step 1: Draw the Recursion Tree
Each recursive call generates
-
4 subproblems
-
each of size n/2.
Step 2: Cost at Each Level
Level 0
Number of nodes
Cost
Level 1
Number of nodes
Each node costs
Therefore
Level 2
Number of nodes
Each node costs
Total cost
Level 3
Number of nodes
Each node costs
Total cost
Pattern
At level ,
Number of nodes
Size of each subproblem
Cost of each node
Total cost
Notice that the cost doubles at every level.
Step 3: Height of the Tree
The recursion stops when
Therefore,
Hence,
Step 4: Cost of the Leaves
Number of leaves
Using the identity
we obtain
Each leaf costs
Therefore,
Step 5: Total Cost
The total cost is
The level costs form a geometric progression
Since
the sum is
Therefore,
Hence,
Since the leaf cost is also
the overall running time is
Guess
From the recursion tree,
Part II: Verify Using the Substitution Method
Step 1: Guess
Assume
for some constant
Step 2: Induction Hypothesis
Assume
Step 3: Substitute
Using the recurrence,
Step 4: Simplify
Since
we obtain
The proof does not close, because of the extra .
Step 5: Strengthen the Induction Hypothesis
Following the CLRS technique, strengthen the hypothesis to
where
Step 6: Substitute Again
Assume
Substitute:
Step 7: Choose the Constant
We want
Therefore,
Subtracting ,
Multiplying by ,
Hence,
Choose
Thus,
which is exactly our strengthened induction hypothesis.
Step 8: Base Case
Choose c sufficiently large so that the inequality holds for .
Thus, the base case is satisfied.
Conclusion
Therefore,
Tight Bound
To prove the lower bound,
assume
Then
Hence,
Combining both bounds,
Final Answer
| Step | Result |
|---|
| Recurrence |
|
| Cost at level i |
|
| Height |
|
| Leaf cost |
|
| Total cost |
|
| Guess | |
| Verified by substitution | |
| Tight bound | |
Observation
This recurrence is a good example where:
-
The cost per level increases geometrically ().
-
The leaf level dominates the total cost.
-
A direct substitution with fails because of the extra , so the induction hypothesis must be strengthened to .
Problem-5
Solve
T(n)=3T(n−1)+1
using
-
Recursion Tree Method
-
Substitution Method
Part I: Recursion Tree Method
Step 1: Draw the Recursion Tree
Each recursive call generates
-
3 recursive calls
-
each of size .
The first few levels are
Notice
-
Each node creates 3 children.
-
The depth increases by 1 each time.
Step 2: Cost at Each Level
Level 0
Number of nodes
Cost
Level 1
Number of nodes
Cost
Level 2
Number of nodes
Cost
Level 3
Cost
Pattern
At level ,
Number of nodes
Each node performs constant work.
Therefore,
Step 3: Height of the Tree
Each recursive call reduces the problem size by
Recursion stops when
Therefore,
Thus, the tree has linear height.
Step 4: Total Cost
The total cost is
This is a geometric series.
Using
with
we obtain
Hence,
Since the last level dominates,
the tight bound is
Guess
From the recursion tree,
Part II: Verify Using the Substitution Method
Step 1: Guess
Assume
for some constant .
Step 2: Induction Hypothesis
Assume
Step 3: Substitute
The recurrence is
Substitute the induction hypothesis.
Step 4: Strengthen the Induction Hypothesis
The direct proof fails because of the extra
Following the CLRS technique, strengthen the hypothesis.
Assume
where
Step 5: Substitute Again
We want
Therefore,
Subtracting ,
Hence,
Thus,
Choose
The induction is complete.
Step 6: Base Case
Choose large enough so that
Hence,
the base case holds.
Conclusion
Therefore,
Tight Bound
To prove the lower bound,
assume
Substituting,
Hence,
Combining,
Alternative Solution (Iteration Method)
This recurrence is actually easier to solve by expansion.
Using the geometric series formula,
we get
Therefore,
Final Answer
| Step | Result |
|---|
| Recurrence |
|
| Tree height | |
Cost at level
|
|
| Total cost |
|
| Geometric sum | |
| Guess | |
| Verified by substitution | |
| Tight bound | |
Observation
Unlike divide-and-conquer recurrences (where the problem size is reduced by a constant factor), this recurrence reduces the problem size by only 1 but branches into 3 recursive calls at each step. As a result, the recursion tree has linear height () and an exponentially increasing number of nodes ( at level ), leading to the exponential running time
Comments
Post a Comment